• Grey Twitter Icon
  • Grey LinkedIn Icon
  • Grey Facebook Icon

© Pacific Coast Council 2018

Peter Friedmann’s View from Washington DC -- December 2019

December 4, 2019

China – Human Rights Will Determine Outcome of the Trade War
Mexico – USMCA Getting Close

 

If there has been bipartisanship on the Hill on anything, it’s on the current US-China Tariff War, and now, in more recent weeks, on addressing China’s human rights practices. In fact, the US response to China’s human rights practices may determine the outcome of the tariff war. It is already impacting negotiations.


First, the US -China trade relationship, specifically, the US imposition of increased tariffs on imports from China (and China’s retaliatory tariffs): Both D’s and R’s tell Trump to stay tough. Better come up with something good – get China to change its bad trade practices; we (the US trade community) need to get something for the pain caused by the tariffs.


Let’s remember, no trade deal has ever been popular on Capitol Hill. If they pass, they do so just barely, with vigorous and bitter opposition. Such was the case with NAFTA 30 years ago, and with allowing China into the World Trade Organization. The Trans Pacific Partnership was opposed by both the R and D Presidential candidates, and defeated in a test vote in the House. So whatever deal we get on NAFTA’s replacement, the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) or with China on tariffs, half of Congress will oppose it – most for political reasons, some for substantive reasons. Nothing new.


Will USMCA pass? Yes. Senate is committed to pass it, the President wants it done. Labor unions are saying Mexico’s commitment to increase wages and working standards are not good enough. Nonetheless, we sense Speaker of the House Pelosi is setting the stage for House passage in the next few months.


Back to China: Congress has already sent a veto-proof bill to the President addressing China’s brutal repression of civil liberties in Hong Kong. This put the President in a tough position – sign the bill and anger China in the midst of trade negotiations; or don’t sign it, and look weak on defending liberties of Hong Kong residents, He signed it. What this does to China’s willingness to make the trade commitments we seek, remains to be seen.


Now Congress is passing another bill that will anger China equally – sanctioning China for its repression of the Uyghur ethnic minorities in eastern China. The House passed a version by 407-1. Bipartisan condemnation. Soon a version of this bill will put the President in the same situation as the Hong Kong bill – should he sign it, standing up for human rights even though it will anger China and jeopardize the trade negotiations? My bet is he will do as he did with the Hong Kong bill – sign it.


Clearly, human rights has bumped trade from the limelight. Congress has not passed a bill on the ongoing the US-China trade dispute, but it is on the verge of passing the second bill sanctioning China for its human rights practices (the Hong Kong and Uyghur bills) . China has already retaliated, restricting US naval access to Hong Kong, etc.


In this environment, it difficult to expect much progress on the trade front. It is quite possible that the US tariffs on China’s exports, and China’s retaliatory tariffs on our exports, could remain in place for another year - at least until the November, 2020 Presidential and Congressional elections.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

RECENT POST
Please reload

  • Twitter Social Icon
  • LinkedIn Social Icon
  • Facebook Social Icon